Christopher Evans Christopher Evans's Profile Page

Christopher Evans Christopher Evans

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

JN0-664덤프샘플다운100％시험패스인증덤프

그리고 Itexamdump JN0-664 시험 문제집의 전체 버전을 클라우드 저장소에서 다운로드할 수 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e0f5URX82FB0msYIga90uiRZRyi6hEbG

Itexamdump 에서 제공해드리는 Juniper인증JN0-664시험덤프자료를 구입하시면 퍼펙트한 구매후 서비스를 약속드립니다. Itexamdump에서 제공해드리는 덤프는 IT업계 유명인사들이 자신들의 노하우와 경험을 토대로 하여 실제 출제되는 시험문제를 연구하여 제작한 최고품질의 덤프자료입니다. Juniper인증JN0-664시험은Itexamdump 표Juniper인증JN0-664덤프자료로 시험준비를 하시면 시험패스는 아주 간단하게 할수 있습니다. 구매하기전 PDF버전 무료샘플을 다운받아 공부하세요.

Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 지름길은Itexamdump에서 연구제작한 Juniper 인증JN0-664시험대비 덤프를 마련하여 충분한 시험준비를 하는것입니다. 덤프는 Juniper 인증JN0-664시험의 모든 범위가 포함되어 있어 시험적중율이 높습니다. Juniper 인증JN0-664시험패는 바로 눈앞에 있습니다. 링크를 클릭하시고Itexamdump의Juniper 인증JN0-664시험대비 덤프를 장바구니에 담고 결제마친후 덤프를 받아 공부하는것입니다.

>> JN0-664덤프샘플 다운 <<

JN0-664덤프샘플 다운 100% 유효한 최신버전 공부자료

비스를 제공해드려 아무런 걱정없이 JN0-664시험에 도전하도록 힘이 되어드립니다. Itexamdump덤프를 사용하여 시험에서 통과하신 분이 전해주신 희소식이 Itexamdump 덤프품질을 증명해드립니다.

주니퍼 JN0-664 (서비스 제공 업체, Professional (JNCIP)) 시험은 서비스 제공 업체 라우팅 및 전환 기술에서 고급 지식과 기술을 시연하려는 네트워크 전문가에게 훌륭한 인증입니다. Juniper Networks 기술에 대한 확실한 이해가 필요한 것은 어려운 시험이지만 새로운 경력 기회를 열고 전문적인 신뢰성을 향상시킬 수 있습니다.

JNCIP-SP Certified Professional로서 서비스 제공 업체 네트워킹 기술 분야에서 전문 지식을 보여줄 수 있습니다. 이 인증은 업계에서 매우 존경 받고 있으며 전 세계의 많은 조직에서 인정 받고 있습니다. 새로운 경력 기회를 열고 경력을 발전시키는 데 도움이 될 수 있습니다.

최신 JNCIP-SP JN0-664 무료샘플문제 (Q87-Q92):

질문 # 87
Exhibit

You are troubleshooting the connection between AS 64496 and AS 64497 and notice that only one of the paths is being used for traffic forwarding.
Referring to the exhibit, which three actions will ensure that R1 is configured properly for load balancing BGP routes? (Choose three.)

A. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on both R2 and R3.
B. Verify that the multipath option is configured under protocols bgp on R1.
C. Verify that the routing table on R1 has BGP routes for 203.0.113.128/25 with multiple next hops.
D. Verify that an import load balancing policy exists under protocols bgp for the received BGP routes on R1.
E. Verify that there is a load balancing export policy under routing-options for the received BGP routes on R1.

정답：B,C,E

설명：
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/bgp/topics/topic-map/load-balancing-bgp-session.html

질문 # 88
You must alter class-of-service values in packets on the outbound interface of an edge router.
In this scenario, which CoS component allows you to accomplish this task?

A. output policer
B. scheduler
C. forwarding classes
D. rewrite rules

정답：D

질문 # 89
Exhibit

A network designer would like to create a summary route as shown in the exhibit, but the configuration is not working.
Which three configuration changes will create a summary route? (Choose three.)

A. set policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes then reject
B. set protocols isis import summary-v6
C. delete protocols isis export summary-v6
D. set policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes from route-filter 2001:db9:a:faOO::/61 exact
E. delete policy-options policy-statement leak-v6 term DC-routes from route-filter 2001: db9 :a: fa00 : :/6l longer

정답：C,D,E

설명：
To create a summary route for IS-IS, you need to configure a policy statement that matches the prefixes to be summarized and sets the next-hop to discard. You also need to configure a summary-address statement under the IS-IS protocol hierarchy that references the policy statement. In this case, the policy statement leak-v6 is trying to match the prefix 2001:db9:a:fa00::/61 exactly, but this prefix is not advertised by any router in the network. Therefore, no summary route is created. To fix this, you need to delete the longer keyword from the route-filter term and change the prefix length to /61 exact. This will match any prefix that falls within the /61 range. You also need to delete the export statement under protocols isis, because this will export all routes that match the policy statement to other IS-IS routers, which is not desired for a summary route.

질문 # 90
Exhibit.

Referring to the exhib.t, what must be changed to establish a Level 1 adjacency between routers R1 and R2?

A. Change the level l disable parameter under the R1 protocols isis interface lo0.0 hierarchy to the level 2 disable parameter.
B. Remove the level i disable parameter under the R2 protocols isis interface loo . 0 configuration hierarchy.
C. Change the level 1 disable parameter under the R2 protocols isis interface ge-1/2/3 .0 hierarchy to the level 2 disable parameter
D. Add IP addresses to the interface ge-l/2/3 unit 0 family iso hierarchy on both R1 and R2.

정답：B

설명：
IS-IS routers can form Level 1 or Level 2 adjacencies depending on their configuration and network topology.
Level 1 routers are intra-area routers that share the same area address with their neighbors. Level 2 routers are inter-area routers that can connect different areas. Level 1-2 routers are both intra-area and inter-area routers that can form adjacencies with any other router.
In the exhibit, R1 and R2 are in different areas (49.0001 and 49.0002), so they cannot form a Level 1 adjacency. However, they can form a Level 2 adjacency if they are both configured as Level 1-2 routers. R1 is already configured as a Level 1-2 router, but R2 is configured as a Level 1 router only, because of the level 1 disable command under the lo0.0 interface. This command disables Level 2 routing on the loopback interface, which is used as the router ID for IS-IS.
Therefore, to establish a Level 1 adjacency between R1 and R2, the level 1 disable command under the R2 protocols isis interface lo0.0 hierarchy must be removed. This will enable Level 2 routing on R2 and allow it to form a Level 2 adjacency with R1.

질문 # 91
Exhibit

R4 is directly connected to both RPs (R2 and R3) R4 is currently sending all ,o,ns upstream to R3 but you want all joins to go to R2 instead Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change will solve this issue?

A. Change the local address on R2 to be higher than R3.
B. Change the group-range to be more specific on R2 than R3.
C. Change the default route in inet.2 on R4 from R3 as the next hop to R2
D. Change the bootstrap priority on R2 to be higher than R3

정답：B

설명：
The issue arises because R3's group-range (224.1.1.0/28) is more specific than R2's group-range (224.1.1.0/24). In PIM bootstrap (BSR), the RP with the longest prefix (most specific group-range) is preferred, regardless of priority. Even though R3 has a higher bootstrap priority (210 vs. R2's 200), its more specific /28 group-range takes precedence for groups within 224.1.1.0/28.
Why Option D is Correct:
To force R4 to use R2 for all joins, R2's group-range must be more specific than R3's. For example:
If R2's group-range is changed to 224.1.1.0/28 (same as R3) but with a higher priority, R2 would win (priority is compared only when group-ranges are equal).
If R2's group-range is changed to 224.1.1.0/29 (more specific than /28), it will override R3's /28 for groups in the /29 range.
The key is prefix specificity, which overrides priority in BSR elections.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
A . Change bootstrap priority on R2 to be higher than R3:
Priority is evaluated only when group-ranges are identical. Since R3's group-range (/28) is more specific than R2's (/24), R3 will still win for groups in 224.1.1.0/28, even if R2's priority is higher.
B . Change the default route in inet.2 on R4:
RPF routes (inet.2) determine how traffic reaches the RP, but they do not influence RP election logic (BSR priority/group-range).
C . Change R2's local address to be higher than R3's:
The RP address is a tiebreaker only if priorities and group-ranges are equal. Since R3's group-range is more specific, this change has no impact.
Key Takeaways:
BSR RP Election Order:
Longest group prefix (most specific).
Highest priority (if prefixes are equal).
Highest RP address (if prefixes and priorities are equal).
To override R3, R2 must advertise a more specific group-range (e.g., /28 or smaller) to ensure it is selected for the desired multicast groups.
Reference:
Juniper PIM Sparse Mode and BSR Configuration.

질문 # 92
......

이 글을 보시게 된다면Juniper인증 JN0-664시험패스를 꿈꾸고 있는 분이라고 믿습니다. Juniper인증 JN0-664시험공부를 아직 시작하지 않으셨다면 망설이지 마시고Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프를 마련하여 공부를 시작해 보세요. 이렇게 착한 가격에 이정도 품질의 덤프자료는 찾기 힘들것입니다. Itexamdump의Juniper인증 JN0-664덤프는 고객님께서 Juniper인증 JN0-664시험을 패스하는 필수품입니다.

JN0-664합격보장 가능 덤프자료: https://www.itexamdump.com/JN0-664.html

그리고 Itexamdump JN0-664 시험 문제집의 전체 버전을 클라우드 저장소에서 다운로드할 수 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e0f5URX82FB0msYIga90uiRZRyi6hEbG

Christopher Evans Christopher Evans

Biography

Useful Links

Subscribe Now